Rabindranath Tagore as an intellectual of high order was deeply derisive of sickular thinking. 

Today, Tagore's Gitanjali wont pass the sickular test, let alone win the Nobel Prize. In Gitanjali, Tagore envisaged an India “.Where the clear stream of reason has not lost its way into the dreary desert sand of dead habit”.

Tagore envisaged an India where native Dharma (clear stream of reason) trumps desert dogmas - islam, christianity (dreary desert sand of dead habits); very reverse of sickularism.

In his remarkable work, Sandip’s story, one can see how derisive, Tagore was on sicko thinking, demolishing it.

 Related:

• Quick Take on Secularism and Bharat
• Take aways for Bharateeya from Binayak Sen Trial
• What is Dharma for a Bharatiya
• Decode Sickular Lies on Indian History
• No Justice for Dead and Mute Anil Kumar. Child Victim of Christian Sexual Abuse – Indian Big Media’s sickular coverage
• Swami’s tryst with jesus
• Radha Krishna – Some differences between Hinduism and Desert Dogmas
• Sickular India: Kashmiri Hindus enter 22nd Year of Exile
• NDTV’s Sickular News Model: Selective Censorship
• Mind-boggling support for Terror Courier Service of Binayak Sen – Why?